Re: [PATCH] Define std::atomic_ref and std::atomic for C++20

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 11/07/19 20:45 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

+  // Repeat for volatile std::atomic<double>
+  if constexpr (std::atomic<long double>::is_always_lock_free)

Thanks to Uros for pointing out this typo. Fixed by the attached
patch, committed to trunk.



commit 991bdaf97870e2775a15314823759aec7fd79599
Author: redi <redi@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date:   Fri Jul 12 15:45:16 2019 +0000

    Fix inaccurate comment in new test
    
            * testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_float/1.cc: Fix comment.
    
    git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@273448 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_float/1.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_float/1.cc
index bd0e353538d..b56c026fb99 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_float/1.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_float/1.cc
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ test03()
     VERIFY( a0 == 13.2l );
   }
 
-  // Repeat for volatile std::atomic<double>
+  // Repeat for volatile std::atomic<long double>
   if constexpr (std::atomic<long double>::is_always_lock_free)
   {
     volatile std::atomic<long double> a0;