Gary Funck <g...@intrepid.com> writes:

> A comment on the documentation:
>
>> Index: gcc/doc/install.texi
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/doc/install.texi      (revision 176348)
>> +++ gcc/doc/install.texi      (working copy)
>> @@ -1286,6 +1286,13 @@ will try to guess whether the @code{.ini
>>  Build GCC using a C++ compiler rather than a C compiler.  This is an
>>  experimental option which may become the default in a later release.
>>  
>> +@item --enable-build-poststage1-with-cxx
>> +When bootstrapping, build stages 2 and 3 of GCC using a C++ compiler
>> +rather than a C compiler.  Stage 1 is still built with a C compiler.
>> +This is an experimental option which may become the default in a later
>> +release.  This is enabled by default and may be disabled using
>> +@option{--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx}.
>> +
>
> The document says "This is an experimental option which may become the
> default in a later release" and then says "This is enabled by default".
> The latter statement is true.

Thanks for pointing this out.  I committed this patch to fix this in the
obvious way.  Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Ian


2011-11-22  Ian Lance Taylor  <i...@google.com>

        * doc/install.texi (Configuration): Correct doc of
        --enable-build-poststage1-with-cxx: it is not experimental.


Index: doc/install.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/install.texi	(revision 181627)
+++ doc/install.texi	(working copy)
@@ -1298,8 +1298,7 @@ experimental option which may become the
 @item --enable-build-poststage1-with-cxx
 When bootstrapping, build stages 2 and 3 of GCC using a C++ compiler
 rather than a C compiler.  Stage 1 is still built with a C compiler.
-This is an experimental option which may become the default in a later
-release.  This is enabled by default and may be disabled using
+This is enabled by default and may be disabled using
 @option{--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx}.
 
 @item --enable-maintainer-mode

Reply via email to