On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 10:40 +0000, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > ------------------------------------------- > --- > On 31/07/2019 08:25, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Steve Ellcey <sell...@marvell.com> writes: > > > > > > 2019-07-30 Steve Ellcey <sell...@marvell.com> > > > > > > * omp-simd-clone.c (simd_clone_adjust_return_type): Remove call > > > to > > > build_distinct_type_copy. > > > (simd_clone_adjust_argument_types): Ditto. > > > (simd_clone_adjust): Call build_distinct_type_copy here. > > > (expand_simd_clones): Ditto. > > > > > > 2019-07-30 Steve Ellcey <sell...@marvell.com> > > > > > > * gcc.target/aarch64/simd_pcs_attribute.c: New test. > > > * gcc.target/aarch64/simd_pcs_attribute-2.c: Ditto. > > > * gcc.target/aarch64/simd_pcs_attribute-3.c: Ditto. > > > > OK if there are no objections in 48 hours. > > i think this should be backported to gcc-9 too.
Yes, I agree. The 9.X branch is frozen right now for the 9.2 release, I will backport it to the branch after it reopens assuming there are no objections. Steve Ellcey sell...@marvell.com
