On 8/14/19 2:50 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 8/13/19 5:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 8/13/19 7:07 AM, Martin Liska wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> For this year, I decided to make a first merge now and the >>> next (much smaller) at the end of October. >>> >>> The biggest change is rename of many files from .cc to .cpp. >>> >>> I bootstrapped the patch set on x86_64-linux-gnu and run >>> asan/ubsan/tsan tests on x86_64, ppc64le (power8) and >>> aarch64. >>> >>> Libasan SONAME has been already bumped compared to GCC 9. >>> >>> For other libraries, I don't see a reason for library bumping: >>> >>> $ abidiff /usr/lib64/libubsan.so.1.0.0 >>> ./x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/ubsan/.libs/libubsan.so.1.0.0 --stat >>> Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 4 Added functions >>> Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable >>> Function symbols changes summary: 3 Removed, 0 Added function symbols not >>> referenced by debug info >>> Variable symbols changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Added variable symbol not >>> referenced by debug info >>> >>> $ abidiff /usr/lib64/libtsan.so.0.0.0 >>> ./x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/tsan/.libs/libtsan.so.0.0.0 --stat >>> Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 47 Added functions >>> Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable >>> Function symbols changes summary: 1 Removed, 2 Added function symbols not >>> referenced by debug info >>> Variable symbols changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Added variable symbol not >>> referenced by debug info >>> >>> Ready to be installed? >> ISTM that a sanitizer merge during stage1 should be able to move forward >> without ACKs. Similarly for other runtimes where we pull from some >> upstream master. > > Good then. I've just installed the patch and also the refresh of > LOCAL_PATCHES. Sounds good. My tester will spin them on a variety of platforms over the next couple days. I won't be at all surprised if the MIPS bits are still flakey.
Jeff
