> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:22:46AM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > > --- a/configure > > +++ b/configure > > @@ -754,6 +754,7 @@ infodir > > docdir > > oldincludedir > > includedir > > +runstatedir > > localstatedir > > sharedstatedir > > sysconfdir > > (etc.) > > You seem to have generated this with the wrong version of autoxxxx, or > the wrong options, or the previous version was. Please check? Or, what > else caused this change? My experience is that this is a commonly added patch to the system autoconf binary, e.g. /usr/bin/autoconf. So you need to build your own autoconf from the FSF sources to get an exact match. Or maybe use a different linux distro that doesn't modify autoconf. But personally I just build my own autoconf binaries to avoid this problem. Yeah by mistake I used a Debian patched autoconf 2.96. Will regenerate using vanilla autoconf for subsequent versions of the patch.
- [PATCH 8/8] bpf: add myself as the maintainer for the e... Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 5/8] bpf: make target-supports.exp aware of eBPF Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 4/8] bpf: gcc.target eBPF testsuite Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 7/8] bpf: manual updates for eBPF Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 6/8] bpf: adjust GCC testsuite to eBPF limitatio... Jose E. Marchesi
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] eBPF support for GCC David Malcolm
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] eBPF support for GCC Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Jose E. Marchesi
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Jose E. Marchesi
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC ... Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC ... Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] eBPF support for GCC Richard Sandiford
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] eBPF support for GCC Jose E. Marchesi
- [PATCH 2/8] bpf: new GCC port Jose E. Marchesi