On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:40:35PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > >@@ -2771,6 +2771,11 @@ load_register_parameters (struct arg_dat
> > >     poly_int64 size = 0;
> > >     HOST_WIDE_INT const_size = 0;
> > >     rtx_insn *before_arg = get_last_insn ();
> > >+    tree type = TREE_TYPE (args[i].tree_value);
> > >+    if ((TREE_CODE (type) == UNION_TYPE
> > >+         || TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE)
> > 
> > RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P ?
> > That would include QUAL_UNION_TYPE ..
> 
> I guess we can do that, we use that guard elsewhere too.  I think nothing
> right now sets TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR on QUAL_UNION_TYPE, but as the 3 are
> next to each other, for optimized compiler it should make no compile time
> difference.
> There are two spots that were checking just for RECORD_TYPE with
> TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR, I believe that is something to handle std::decimal*
> and I have left it as is.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

OK.

> 2019-09-06  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       * function.c (assign_parm_find_data_types): Use RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P
>       before testing TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR.
>       * calls.c (initialize_argument_information, load_register_parameters):
>       Likewise.
> 
> --- gcc/function.c.jj 2019-08-29 10:22:19.573503198 +0200
> +++ gcc/function.c    2019-09-05 22:04:49.911484885 +0200
> @@ -2443,8 +2443,7 @@ assign_parm_find_data_types (struct assi
>    /* If the parm is to be passed as a transparent union or record, use the
>       type of the first field for the tests below.  We have already verified
>       that the modes are the same.  */
> -  if ((TREE_CODE (data->arg.type) == UNION_TYPE
> -       || TREE_CODE (data->arg.type) == RECORD_TYPE)
> +  if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (data->arg.type)
>        && TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (data->arg.type))
>      data->arg.type = TREE_TYPE (first_field (data->arg.type));
>  
> --- gcc/calls.c.jj    2019-09-05 15:29:45.432252481 +0200
> +++ gcc/calls.c       2019-09-05 22:04:10.744072074 +0200
> @@ -1991,8 +1991,7 @@ initialize_argument_information (int num
>        /* If TYPE is a transparent union or record, pass things the way
>        we would pass the first field of the union or record.  We have
>        already verified that the modes are the same.  */
> -      if ((TREE_CODE (type) == UNION_TYPE || TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE)
> -        && TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (type))
> +      if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (type))
>       type = TREE_TYPE (first_field (type));
>  
>        /* Decide where to pass this arg.
> @@ -2772,9 +2771,7 @@ load_register_parameters (struct arg_dat
>         HOST_WIDE_INT const_size = 0;
>         rtx_insn *before_arg = get_last_insn ();
>         tree type = TREE_TYPE (args[i].tree_value);
> -       if ((TREE_CODE (type) == UNION_TYPE
> -            || TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE)
> -           && TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (type))
> +       if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR (type))
>           type = TREE_TYPE (first_field (type));
>         /* Set non-negative if we must move a word at a time, even if
>            just one word (e.g, partial == 4 && mode == DFmode).  Set
> 
> 
>       Jakub
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 247165 (AG München)

Reply via email to