The documentation used to indicate that the inline keyword was only
supported by c99 and c11, whereas in fact it is supported by c99 and all
newer standards.
gcc/ChangeLog
2019-09-24 Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com>
* doc/extended.texi (Alternate Keywords): Change "-std=c11" to "a
later standard."
---
gcc/doc/extend.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index 64fccfe9b87..ef2fde3d989 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -10739,7 +10739,7 @@ a general-purpose header file that should be usable by
all programs,
including ISO C programs. The keywords @code{asm}, @code{typeof} and
@code{inline} are not available in programs compiled with
@option{-ansi} or @option{-std} (although @code{inline} can be used in a
-program compiled with @option{-std=c99} or @option{-std=c11}). The
+program compiled with @option{-std=c99} or a later standard). The
ISO C99 keyword
@code{restrict} is only available when @option{-std=gnu99} (which will
eventually be the default) or @option{-std=c99} (or the equivalent
--
2.21.0
