CC: YunQiang Su

On 25.09.2019. 09:16, Dragan Mladjenovic wrote:
> From: "Dragan Mladjenovic" <dmladjeno...@wavecomp.com>
>
> This fixes the issue by checking that addr's base reg is not part of dest
> multiword reg instead just checking the first reg of dest.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-09-25  Dragan Mladjenovic  <dmladjeno...@wavecomp.com>
>
>       PR target/91769
>       * config/mips/mips.c (mips_split_move): Use reg_overlap_mentioned_p
>       instead of REGNO equality check on addr.reg.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-09-25  Dragan Mladjenovic  <dmladjeno...@wavecomp.com>
>
>       PR target/91769
>       * gcc.target/mips/pr91769.c: New test.
> ---
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is this OK for trunk?
>
> The test case is a bit crude, but I guess that is better than having none.
>
> On top of that, I would like to backport this along with r273174 onto gcc 9 
> branch.
> That should fix BZ91702 and BZ91474 reported against gcc 9.2.
>
> Tested on mips-mti-linux-gnu.
>
> Best regards,
> Dragan
>
>   gcc/config/mips/mips.c                  |  2 +-
>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr91769.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr91769.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
> index c682ebd..aa527b4 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
> @@ -4862,7 +4862,7 @@ mips_split_move (rtx dest, rtx src, enum 
> mips_split_type split_type, rtx insn_)
>               {
>                 rtx tmp = XEXP (src, 0);
>                 mips_classify_address (&addr, tmp, GET_MODE (tmp), true);
> -               if (addr.reg && REGNO (addr.reg) != REGNO (dest))
> +               if (addr.reg && !reg_overlap_mentioned_p (dest, addr.reg))
>                   validate_change (next, &SET_SRC (set), src, false);
>               }
>             else
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr91769.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr91769.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b856183
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr91769.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* PR target/91769 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "naming registers makes this a code quality test" { *-*-* } 
> { "-O0" "-g" } { "" } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-EL -mgp32 -mhard-float" } */
> +
> +NOCOMPRESSION double
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  register double* pf __asm__ ("$a1");
> +  __asm__ __volatile__ ("":"=r"(pf));
> +  double f = *pf;
> +
> +  if (f != f)
> +    f = -f;
> +  return f;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not 
> "lw\t\\\$4,0\\(\\\$5\\)\n\tlw\t\\\$5,4\\(\\\$5\\)\n\tldc1\t\\\$.*,0\\(\\\$5\\)"
>  } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler 
> "lw\t\\\$4,0\\(\\\$5\\)\n\tlw\t\\\$5,4\\(\\\$5\\)\n\tmtc1\t\\\$4,\\\$.*\n\tmthc1\t\\\$5,\\\$.*"
>  } } */
>

Reply via email to