The following patch uses correct SSE register class; vzeroupper
operates only on lower 16 (8 on 32bit target) SSE registers.
2019-10-08 Uroš Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
PR target/91994
* config/i386/i386.c (x86_avx_u128_mode_needed): Use SSE_REG
instead of ALL_SSE_REG to check if function call preserves some
256-bit SSE registers.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
Committed to mainline SVN.
Uros.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:14 PM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 5:48 PM Richard Sandiford
> <richard.sandif...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > > The comment suggests that this code is only needed for Win64 and that
> > > not testing for Win64 is just a simplification. But in practice it was
> > > needed for correctness on GNU/Linux and other targets too, since without
> > > it the RA would be able to keep 256-bit and 512-bit values in SSE
> > > registers across calls that are known not to clobber them.
> > >
> > > This patch conservatively treats calls as AVX_U128_ANY if the RA can see
> > > that some SSE registers are not touched by a call. There are then no
> > > regressions if the ix86_hard_regno_call_part_clobbered check is disabled
> > > for GNU/Linux (not something we should do, was just for testing).
>
> If RA can sse that some SSE regs are not touched by the call, then we
> are sure that the called function is part of the current TU. In this
> case, the called function will be compiled using VEX instructions,
> where there is no AVX-SSE transition penalty. So, skipping VZEROUPPER
> is beneficial here.
>
> Uros.
>
> > > If in fact we want -fipa-ra to pretend that all functions clobber
> > > SSE registers above 128 bits, it'd certainly be possible to arrange
> > > that. But IMO that would be an optimisation decision, whereas what
> > > the patch is fixing is a correctness decision. So I think we should
> > > have this check even so.
> >
> > 2019-09-25 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com>
> >
> > gcc/
> > * config/i386/i386.c: Include function-abi.h.
> > (ix86_avx_u128_mode_needed): Treat function calls as AVX_U128_ANY
> > if they preserve some 256-bit or 512-bit SSE registers.
> >
> > Index: gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2019-09-25 16:47:48.000000000 +0100
> > +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c 2019-09-25 16:47:49.089962608 +0100
> > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ #define IN_TARGET_CODE 1
> > #include "i386-builtins.h"
> > #include "i386-expand.h"
> > #include "i386-features.h"
> > +#include "function-abi.h"
> >
> > /* This file should be included last. */
> > #include "target-def.h"
> > @@ -13511,6 +13512,15 @@ ix86_avx_u128_mode_needed (rtx_insn *ins
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + /* If the function is known to preserve some SSE registers,
> > + RA and previous passes can legitimately rely on that for
> > + modes wider than 256 bits. It's only safe to issue a
> > + vzeroupper if all SSE registers are clobbered. */
> > + const function_abi &abi = insn_callee_abi (insn);
> > + if (!hard_reg_set_subset_p (reg_class_contents[ALL_SSE_REGS],
> > + abi.mode_clobbers (V4DImode)))
> > + return AVX_U128_ANY;
> > +
> > return AVX_U128_CLEAN;
> > }
> >
Index: config/i386/i386.c
===================================================================
--- config/i386/i386.c (revision 276677)
+++ config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
@@ -13530,7 +13530,7 @@ ix86_avx_u128_mode_needed (rtx_insn *insn)
modes wider than 256 bits. It's only safe to issue a
vzeroupper if all SSE registers are clobbered. */
const function_abi &abi = insn_callee_abi (insn);
- if (!hard_reg_set_subset_p (reg_class_contents[ALL_SSE_REGS],
+ if (!hard_reg_set_subset_p (reg_class_contents[SSE_REGS],
abi.mode_clobbers (V4DImode)))
return AVX_U128_ANY;
