On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 7:58 AM Steve Kargl
<s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:56:15PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > In PR fortran/91513, Damian Rouson points out that the Fortran
> > does contain the words "impure variable".
>
> Geez. That is a messed up sentence.
>
> In PR fortran/91513, Damian Rouson points out that the Fortran
> *standard* does *not* contain the words "impure variable.
>
> (It's late, and I'm tired!)
>
> >  Damian and I spent
> > an afternoon together a few weeks ago where I gave Damian a
> > world wind view of how I see gcc/fortran and go about debugging
> > problems.  Damian and I both have full schedules, but I was
> > hoping he would submit the patch to the list.  My time of
> > fixing gfortran bugs is running out, so ...
> >
> > OK to commit?
> >
> > 2019-09-29  Damian Rouson  <dam...@sourceryinstitue.org>
> >
> >       PR fortran/91513
> >       * resolve.c (resolve_ordinary_assign): Improved error message.
> >
> > 2019-09-29  Damian Rouson  <dam...@sourceryinstitue.org>
> >
> >       PR fortran/91513
> >       * gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_2.f90: Update dg-error regex.
> >
> > --
> > Steve

Ok



-- 
Janne Blomqvist

Reply via email to