Hi!

The testcase from the PR ICEs on rs6000.  For __builtin_isunordered etc.
the folding makes sure that there is no *ORDERED_EXPR etc. in the IL
if !HONOR_NANS, but the complex multiplication can emit it when mixing
-Ofast with -fno-cx-limited-range.
The following patch makes sure we don't emit it even in that case.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

I'll defer the addition of the testcase and rs6000 changes to Segher.

2019-11-11  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/92449
        * tree-complex.c (expand_complex_multiplication): If !HONOR_NANS,
        don't emit UNORDERED_EXPR guarded libcall.  Formatting fixes.

--- gcc/tree-complex.c.jj       2019-01-10 11:43:02.252577041 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-complex.c  2019-11-11 20:26:28.585315282 +0100
@@ -1144,6 +1144,16 @@ expand_complex_multiplication (gimple_st
              return;
            }
 
+         if (!HONOR_NANS (inner_type))
+           {
+             /* If we are not worrying about NaNs expand to
+                (ar*br - ai*bi) + i(ar*bi + br*ai) directly.  */
+             expand_complex_multiplication_components (gsi, inner_type,
+                                                       ar, ai, br, bi,
+                                                       &rr, &ri);
+             break;
+           }
+
          /* Else, expand x = a * b into
             x = (ar*br - ai*bi) + i(ar*bi + br*ai);
             if (isunordered (__real__ x, __imag__ x))
@@ -1151,7 +1161,7 @@ expand_complex_multiplication (gimple_st
 
          tree tmpr, tmpi;
          expand_complex_multiplication_components (gsi, inner_type, ar, ai,
-                                                    br, bi, &tmpr, &tmpi);
+                                                   br, bi, &tmpr, &tmpi);
 
          gimple *check
            = gimple_build_cond (UNORDERED_EXPR, tmpr, tmpi,
@@ -1167,13 +1177,12 @@ expand_complex_multiplication (gimple_st
            = insert_cond_bb (gsi_bb (*gsi), gsi_stmt (*gsi), check,
                              profile_probability::very_unlikely ());
 
-
          gimple_stmt_iterator cond_bb_gsi = gsi_last_bb (cond_bb);
          gsi_insert_after (&cond_bb_gsi, gimple_build_nop (), GSI_NEW_STMT);
 
          tree libcall_res
            = expand_complex_libcall (&cond_bb_gsi, type, ar, ai, br,
-                                      bi, MULT_EXPR, false);
+                                     bi, MULT_EXPR, false);
          tree cond_real = gimplify_build1 (&cond_bb_gsi, REALPART_EXPR,
                                            inner_type, libcall_res);
          tree cond_imag = gimplify_build1 (&cond_bb_gsi, IMAGPART_EXPR,
@@ -1190,20 +1199,18 @@ expand_complex_multiplication (gimple_st
          edge orig_to_join = find_edge (orig_bb, join_bb);
 
          gphi *real_phi = create_phi_node (rr, gsi_bb (*gsi));
-         add_phi_arg (real_phi, cond_real, cond_to_join,
-                       UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
+         add_phi_arg (real_phi, cond_real, cond_to_join, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
          add_phi_arg (real_phi, tmpr, orig_to_join, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
 
          gphi *imag_phi = create_phi_node (ri, gsi_bb (*gsi));
-         add_phi_arg (imag_phi, cond_imag, cond_to_join,
-                       UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
+         add_phi_arg (imag_phi, cond_imag, cond_to_join, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
          add_phi_arg (imag_phi, tmpi, orig_to_join, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
        }
       else
        /* If we are not worrying about NaNs expand to
          (ar*br - ai*bi) + i(ar*bi + br*ai) directly.  */
        expand_complex_multiplication_components (gsi, inner_type, ar, ai,
-                                                     br, bi, &rr, &ri);
+                                                 br, bi, &rr, &ri);
       break;
 
     default:

        Jakub

Reply via email to