Hi, On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I'm just a bit worried about the name "delete_label". "delete_insn > > (label)" should always do the right thing for a pure deletion; the > > point of the new routine is that it also moves instructions. > > It only fixes things up though, so that the RTL stream is valid again. > Hence the question: why not retrofit it into delete_insn directly? Was my first reaction too. What good is delete_insn(label) if it leaves the stream in a state to be fixed up immediately. Ciao, Michael.
