On Nov 14, 2019, Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com> wrote:
> %{!c:%{!S:-dumpbase %b}
Uhh, I failed to adjust this one to add the executable output name to
dumpbase.
Anyway, getting the right semantics out of specs is providing to be a
lot trickier than I had anticipated. I'm now pondering a single spec
function to deal with all of these dumpbase possibilities.
I'm also a little uncertain about behavior change WRT .dwo files.
Though their names are built out of the .o files in the objcopy
commands, they're built from aux_base_name in dwarf2out. Currently,
since aux_base_name is derived from the output object file name, this
ensures they have the same name and directory, but once we enable
-dumpdir to be specified to override it, that may no longer be the
case. Ugh...
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter he/him https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo
Free Software Evangelist Stallman was right, but he's left :(
GNU Toolchain Engineer FSMatrix: It was he who freed the first of us
FSF & FSFLA board member The Savior shall return (true);
