Jakub's recent changes to fix 92449 regresses complex-6 on the rx port
because it defaults to !HONOR_NANs which compromises this test.
ISTM the best thing to do is just avoid the two dump scans for the rx
target. I haven't seen another port trip over this so I didn't create
an effective-target test.
Installing on the trunk momentarily.
Jeff
* gcc.dg/complex-6.c: Do not run dump scan tests for rx target.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/complex-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/complex-6.c
index e70322bf6f3..a7eae1e2513 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/complex-6.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/complex-6.c
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ foo (__complex float a, __complex float b)
return a * b;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "unord" 1 "cplxlower1" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "__mulsc3" 1 "cplxlower1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "unord" 1 "cplxlower1" { target { !
rx*-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "__mulsc3" 1 "cplxlower1" { target { !
rx*-*-* } } } } */
