On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 7:27 AM Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 11/14/19 5:21 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:35 AM Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi: > >> As mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg00832.html > >>> So yes, it's poorly named. A preparatory patch to clean this up > >>> (and maybe split it into TARGET_AVX256_SPLIT_REGS and > >>> TARGET_AVX128_OPTIMAL) > >>> would be nice. > >> > >> Bootstrap and regression test for i386 backend is ok. > >> Ok for trunk? > > > > It looks OK to me, please let x86 maintainers a day to comment, otherwise OK > I think this fine to go in now. Uros largely leaves the AVX bits to others. Committed, thanks. > > jeff >
-- BR, Hongtao
