Hi!

On 2019-12-03T12:56:49+0000, Andrew Stubbs <a...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 02/12/2019 14:19, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> Generally, I'm in favor if you'd consider such a thing (that in principle
>> is just a copy/adapt of the existing cases) as obvious to commit (even
>> more so with your "amdgcn port" maintainer hat on), especially so given
>> that this has been/is blocking you, as Tobias told me more than once.
>
> I probably will do for incremental tweaks, but I left some stuff in this 
> one to see if you were awake (that's my story and I'm sticking to it).

Haha!  ;-P


> Here's what I have committed (and I just realized I forgot the new 
> fangled reviewed-by tag, sorry).

No worries.  That's just an experiment anyway -- seems to work/have been
picked up for glibc, but not so much for GCC.


About the alphabetic sorting that I've mentioned: sometimes we do that,
sometimes we sort per 'GOMP_DEVICE_*'/'acc_device_t'/whatever ordering,
sometimes special cases go to the beginning/end, sometimes it's "in order
of appearance", or seemingly random, or any combination of all these.  So
there isn't a general guideline to follow.  However, to make reading the
code more easy/enjoyable, what I like to see, is at least some kind of
local consistency, instead of just always adding new stuff to the
end. (Where the latter might indeed be the right thing to do in certain
cases, given that 'GOMP_DEVICE_GCN' is the last one in the list.)


Grüße
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to