On 12/07/2011 10:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:10:08AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/06/2011 02:48 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
- gcc_assert (!processing_template_decl || SCALAR_TYPE_P (type));
+ gcc_assert (!processing_template_decl
+ || (SCALAR_TYPE_P (type) || TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE));
How about SCALAR_TYPE_P (strip_array_types (type))? OK with that change.
That would be readable, but expensive - SCALAR_TYPE_P evaluates
its argument 11 times.
Good point. Your patch is OK, then.
Jasno
