On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 08:17 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> +   if (a & (long long) 0x400)
>> +      return 1;
>> +   return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "andl" { target i?86-*-linux* 
>> x86_64-*-linux* } } } " */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "setne" { target i?86-*-linux* 
>> x86_64-*-linux* } } }" */
>
> Huh?  Why would we want to find setne here?

I fixed that in the patch which I committed and I forgot to mention that here.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Reply via email to