On 12/10/2011 02:16 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Using the parent node for aliases (as in your patch) makes sense, but I don't see tree_function_versioning() segfaulting as you claim. What I see is estimate_function_body_sizes()
Humm you are seeing this I guess: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00427.html When applied, you should probably see the tree_function_versioning problem. Patrick.