On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:29 AM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:47 AM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:46 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > OK. Let's go with this version, but please investigate if we need to
> > > > > calculate TLS address in ptr_mode instead of Pmode. Due to quite some
> > > > > zero-extension from ptr_mode to Pmode hacks in this area, it looks to
> > > > > me that the whole calculation should be performed in ptr_mode (SImode
> > > > > in case of x32), and the result zero-extended to Pmode in case when
> > > > > Pmode = DImode.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I checked it in.  I will investigate if we can use ptr_mode for TLS.
> > >
> > > Here is a patch to perform GNU2 TLS address computation in ptr_mode
> > > and zero-extend result to Pmode.
> >
> >      case TLS_MODEL_GLOBAL_DYNAMIC:
> > -      dest = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode);
> > +      dest = gen_reg_rtx (TARGET_GNU2_TLS ? ptr_mode : Pmode);
> >
> > Please put these in their respective arms of "if (TARGET_GNU2_TLS).
> >
> >      case TLS_MODEL_LOCAL_DYNAMIC:
> > -      base = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode);
> > +      base = gen_reg_rtx (TARGET_GNU2_TLS ? ptr_mode : Pmode);
> >
> > Also here.
> >
> > A question: Do we need to emit the following part in Pmode?
>
> To answer my own question: Yes. Linker doesn't like SImode relocs fox
> x86_64 and for
>
> addl    $foo@dtpoff, %eax
>
> errors out with:
>
> pr93319-1a.s: Assembler messages:
> pr93319-1a.s:20: Error: relocated field and relocation type differ in 
> signedness
>
> So, the part below is OK, except:
>
> -      tp = get_thread_pointer (Pmode, true);
> -      set_unique_reg_note (get_last_insn (), REG_EQUAL,
> -                   gen_rtx_MINUS (Pmode, tmp, tp));
> +      tp = get_thread_pointer (ptr_mode, true);
> +      tmp = gen_rtx_MINUS (ptr_mode, tmp, tp);
> +      if (GET_MODE (tmp) != Pmode)
> +        tmp = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, tmp);
> +      set_unique_reg_note (get_last_insn (), REG_EQUAL, tmp);
>
> I don't think we should attach this note to the thread pointer
> initialization. I have removed this part from the patch, but please
> review the decision.
>
> and
>
> -        dest = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, tp, dest);
> +        dest = gen_rtx_PLUS (ptr_mode, tp, dest);
>
> Please leave Pmode here. ptr_mode == Pmode at this point, but Pmode
> better documents the mode selection logic.
>
> Also, the tests fail for me with:
>
> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:13:11: fatal error: gnu/stubs-x32.h: No such
> file or directory
>
> so either use __builtin_printf or some other approach that doesn't
> need to #include stdio.h.
>
> A patch that implements above changes is attached to the message.
>

Here is the updated patch.  OK for master?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.
From 01b20630518882fa3952962b26bfbb2465e08036 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:30:04 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] i386: Do GNU2 TLS address computation in ptr_mode

Since GNU2 TLS address from glibc run-time is in ptr_mode, we should do
GNU2 TLS address computation in ptr_mode and zero-extend result to Pmode.

2020-01-21  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu...@intel.com>
	    Uros Bizjak    <ubiz...@gmail.com>

gcc/

	PR target/93319
	* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_tls_module_base): Replace Pmode
	with ptr_mode.
	(legitimize_tls_address): Do GNU2 TLS address computation in
	ptr_mode and zero-extend result to Pmode.
	*  config/i386/i386.md (@tls_dynamic_gnu2_64_<mode>): Replace
	:P with :PTR and Pmode with ptr_mode.
	(*tls_dynamic_gnu2_lea_64_<mode>): Likewise.
	(*tls_dynamic_gnu2_call_64_<mode>): Likewise.
	(*tls_dynamic_gnu2_combine_64_<mode>): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/

2020-01-21  Uros Bizjak    <ubiz...@gmail.com>

	PR target/93319
	* gcc.target/i386/pr93319-1a.c: Don't include <stdio.h>.
	(test1): Replace printf with __builtin_printf.
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386.c                     | 43 ++++++++-----------
 gcc/config/i386/i386.md                    | 48 +++++++++++-----------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93319-1a.c |  6 +--
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 0b8a4b9ee4f..ffe60baa72a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -10717,7 +10717,7 @@ ix86_tls_module_base (void)
   if (!ix86_tls_module_base_symbol)
     {
       ix86_tls_module_base_symbol
-	= gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF (Pmode, "_TLS_MODULE_BASE_");
+	= gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF (ptr_mode, "_TLS_MODULE_BASE_");
 
       SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS (ix86_tls_module_base_symbol)
 	|= TLS_MODEL_GLOBAL_DYNAMIC << SYMBOL_FLAG_TLS_SHIFT;
@@ -10748,8 +10748,6 @@ legitimize_tls_address (rtx x, enum tls_model model, bool for_mov)
   switch (model)
     {
     case TLS_MODEL_GLOBAL_DYNAMIC:
-      dest = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode);
-
       if (!TARGET_64BIT)
 	{
 	  if (flag_pic && !TARGET_PECOFF)
@@ -10763,24 +10761,16 @@ legitimize_tls_address (rtx x, enum tls_model model, bool for_mov)
 
       if (TARGET_GNU2_TLS)
 	{
+	  dest = gen_reg_rtx (ptr_mode);
 	  if (TARGET_64BIT)
-	    emit_insn (gen_tls_dynamic_gnu2_64 (Pmode, dest, x));
+	    emit_insn (gen_tls_dynamic_gnu2_64 (ptr_mode, dest, x));
 	  else
 	    emit_insn (gen_tls_dynamic_gnu2_32 (dest, x, pic));
 
-	  tp = get_thread_pointer (Pmode, true);
-
-	  /* NB: Since DEST set by tls_dynamic_gnu2_64 is in ptr_mode,
-	     make sure that PLUS is done in ptr_mode.  */
-	  if (Pmode != ptr_mode)
-	    {
-	      tp = lowpart_subreg (ptr_mode, tp, Pmode);
-	      dest = lowpart_subreg (ptr_mode, dest, Pmode);
-	      dest = gen_rtx_PLUS (ptr_mode, tp, dest);
-	      dest = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, dest);
-	    }
-	  else
-	    dest = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, tp, dest);
+	  tp = get_thread_pointer (ptr_mode, true);
+	  dest = gen_rtx_PLUS (ptr_mode, tp, dest);
+	  if (GET_MODE (dest) != Pmode)
+	     dest = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, dest);
 	  dest = force_reg (Pmode, dest);
 
 	  if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
@@ -10792,6 +10782,7 @@ legitimize_tls_address (rtx x, enum tls_model model, bool for_mov)
 	{
 	  rtx caddr = ix86_tls_get_addr ();
 
+	  dest = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode);
 	  if (TARGET_64BIT)
 	    {
 	      rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG);
@@ -10815,8 +10806,6 @@ legitimize_tls_address (rtx x, enum tls_model model, bool for_mov)
       break;
 
     case TLS_MODEL_LOCAL_DYNAMIC:
-      base = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode);
-
       if (!TARGET_64BIT)
 	{
 	  if (flag_pic)
@@ -10832,19 +10821,22 @@ legitimize_tls_address (rtx x, enum tls_model model, bool for_mov)
 	{
 	  rtx tmp = ix86_tls_module_base ();
 
+	  base = gen_reg_rtx (ptr_mode);
 	  if (TARGET_64BIT)
-	    emit_insn (gen_tls_dynamic_gnu2_64 (Pmode, base, tmp));
+	    emit_insn (gen_tls_dynamic_gnu2_64 (ptr_mode, base, tmp));
 	  else
 	    emit_insn (gen_tls_dynamic_gnu2_32 (base, tmp, pic));
 
-	  tp = get_thread_pointer (Pmode, true);
-	  set_unique_reg_note (get_last_insn (), REG_EQUAL,
-			       gen_rtx_MINUS (Pmode, tmp, tp));
+	  tp = get_thread_pointer (ptr_mode, true);
+	  if (GET_MODE (base) != Pmode)
+	    base = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, base);
+	  base = force_reg (Pmode, base);
 	}
       else
 	{
 	  rtx caddr = ix86_tls_get_addr ();
 
+	  base = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode);
 	  if (TARGET_64BIT)
 	    {
 	      rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG);
@@ -10876,11 +10868,8 @@ legitimize_tls_address (rtx x, enum tls_model model, bool for_mov)
 
       if (TARGET_GNU2_TLS)
 	{
-	  /* NB: Since DEST set by tls_dynamic_gnu2_64 is in ptr_mode,
-	     make sure that PLUS is done in ptr_mode.  */
-	  if (Pmode != ptr_mode)
+	  if (GET_MODE (tp) != Pmode)
 	    {
-	      tp = lowpart_subreg (ptr_mode, tp, Pmode);
 	      dest = lowpart_subreg (ptr_mode, dest, Pmode);
 	      dest = gen_rtx_PLUS (ptr_mode, tp, dest);
 	      dest = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, dest);
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index de335cb8f02..6c674aaea5b 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -15187,23 +15187,23 @@
 
 (define_expand "@tls_dynamic_gnu2_64_<mode>"
   [(set (match_dup 2)
-	(unspec:P [(match_operand 1 "tls_symbolic_operand")]
-		  UNSPEC_TLSDESC))
-   (parallel
-    [(set (match_operand:P 0 "register_operand")
-	  (unspec:P [(match_dup 1) (match_dup 2) (reg:P SP_REG)]
+	(unspec:PTR [(match_operand 1 "tls_symbolic_operand")]
 		    UNSPEC_TLSDESC))
+   (parallel
+    [(set (match_operand:PTR 0 "register_operand")
+	  (unspec:PTR [(match_dup 1) (match_dup 2) (reg:PTR SP_REG)]
+		      UNSPEC_TLSDESC))
      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
   "TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_GNU2_TLS"
 {
-  operands[2] = can_create_pseudo_p () ? gen_reg_rtx (Pmode) : operands[0];
+  operands[2] = can_create_pseudo_p () ? gen_reg_rtx (ptr_mode) : operands[0];
   ix86_tls_descriptor_calls_expanded_in_cfun = true;
 })
 
 (define_insn "*tls_dynamic_gnu2_lea_64_<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:P 0 "register_operand" "=r")
-	(unspec:P [(match_operand 1 "tls_symbolic_operand")]
-		  UNSPEC_TLSDESC))]
+  [(set (match_operand:PTR 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+	(unspec:PTR [(match_operand 1 "tls_symbolic_operand")]
+		    UNSPEC_TLSDESC))]
   "TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_GNU2_TLS"
   "lea%z0\t{%E1@TLSDESC(%%rip), %0|%0, %E1@TLSDESC[rip]}"
   [(set_attr "type" "lea")
@@ -15212,10 +15212,10 @@
    (set_attr "length_address" "4")])
 
 (define_insn "*tls_dynamic_gnu2_call_64_<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:P 0 "register_operand" "=a")
-	(unspec:P [(match_operand 1 "tls_symbolic_operand")
-		   (match_operand:P 2 "register_operand" "0")
-		   (reg:P SP_REG)]
+  [(set (match_operand:PTR 0 "register_operand" "=a")
+	(unspec:PTR [(match_operand 1 "tls_symbolic_operand")
+		   (match_operand:PTR 2 "register_operand" "0")
+		   (reg:PTR SP_REG)]
 		  UNSPEC_TLSDESC))
    (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
   "TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_GNU2_TLS"
@@ -15225,23 +15225,23 @@
    (set_attr "length_address" "0")])
 
 (define_insn_and_split "*tls_dynamic_gnu2_combine_64_<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:P 0 "register_operand" "=&a")
-	(plus:P
-	 (unspec:P [(match_operand 2 "tls_modbase_operand")
-		     (match_operand:P 3)
-		     (reg:P SP_REG)]
-		   UNSPEC_TLSDESC)
-	 (const:P (unspec:P
-		    [(match_operand 1 "tls_symbolic_operand")]
-		    UNSPEC_DTPOFF))))
+  [(set (match_operand:PTR 0 "register_operand" "=&a")
+	(plus:PTR
+	 (unspec:PTR [(match_operand 2 "tls_modbase_operand")
+		      (match_operand:PTR 3)
+		      (reg:PTR SP_REG)]
+		     UNSPEC_TLSDESC)
+	 (const:PTR (unspec:PTR
+		     [(match_operand 1 "tls_symbolic_operand")]
+		     UNSPEC_DTPOFF))))
    (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
   "TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_GNU2_TLS"
   "#"
   ""
   [(set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 4))]
 {
-  operands[4] = can_create_pseudo_p () ? gen_reg_rtx (Pmode) : operands[0];
-  emit_insn (gen_tls_dynamic_gnu2_64 (Pmode, operands[4], operands[1]));
+  operands[4] = can_create_pseudo_p () ? gen_reg_rtx (ptr_mode) : operands[0];
+  emit_insn (gen_tls_dynamic_gnu2_64 (ptr_mode, operands[4], operands[1]));
 })
 
 (define_split
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93319-1a.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93319-1a.c
index 8f6b4af3225..122c111d0cb 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93319-1a.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93319-1a.c
@@ -4,21 +4,19 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target tls_native } */
 /* { dg-options "-mx32 -fPIC -mtls-dialect=gnu2" } */
 
-#include <stdio.h>
-
 extern __thread int bar;
 static __thread int foo = 30;
 
 int *
 test1 (void)
 {
-  printf ("foo: %d\n", foo);
+  __builtin_printf ("foo: %d\n", foo);
   return &foo;
 }
 
 int *
 test2 (void)
 {
-  printf ("bar: %d\n", bar);
+  __builtin_printf ("bar: %d\n", bar);
   return &bar;
 }
-- 
2.24.1

Reply via email to