On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Richard Sandiford wrote: > [Mingjie, please could you help with the Loongson question near the end?]
> As H-P mentioned, this changes the __builtin_* interface for the PSHUFH > intrinsics. These intrinsics are supposed to be used via the inline > wrappers in loongson.h, so we can either keep the unused argument in > the pshufh_{u,s} or, as H-P suggests, remove the argument from both. > I don't know which is better. loongson.h needs to change either way, > so in the patch below, I went for the former. The latter would need > testsuite changes too. Mingjie, which do you think is best? Please also consider incrementing __mips_loongson_vector_rev, or if currently empty, set to 1. And mention PR48068 in the changelog; fixed in part. (I can't see what builtin_define does, set it to 1 or just defined?) brgds, H-P