On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 8:58 PM Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2020, at 2:07 PM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > I ran into difficulties with the Graphviz format changing from under > > me during an upgrade, where the new version of "dot" would reject .dot > > files generated by the analyzer. > > > > Thoughts? > > [ consider this a peanut gallery comment ] Another thought would be to > bump the version required and just not worry about it. The people that > have, like and use dot, are likely small, so I'd like to think they can > update it. I don't have/use dot, so, I'm happy to defer to others that > have, use, and play with dot. Eh, dot is part of graphviz, which is a dependency of lots of other software packages out there... I rarely ever invoke dot manually, but I see it running all the time whenever it gets called by doxygen to autogenerate a package's documentation, and, considering how many users doxygen has, that's kind of a lot. I'm guessing dot's number of users is probably larger than small, too.
