On 29/01/2020 12:30, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
As can be seen in the code a few lines below, the very same problem also
exists for the 'wait' clause; it seems reasonable to fix both at the same
time.  This is not a recent regression, but a user-visible valid-code ICE
that has existed "forever"; I filed <https://gcc.gnu.org/PR93488> "ICE in
type-cast 'async', 'wait' clauses" for tracking.  This problem is similar
to the OpenMP 'device' clause <https://gcc.gnu.org/PR71758> "ICE in
verify_gimple_in_cfg, at tree-cfg.c:5212"; I suggest we also use
'force_gimple_operand_gsi' instead of manually doing your suggested
'create_tmp_var', 'gimple_build_assign', 'gsi_insert_before'.  Include a
test case that covers all relevant code paths; I've attached a test case
to the PR, but I've not verified whether "that covers *all* relevant code
paths".  This should then be backported to all GCC release branches; I
can easily test the backports for you, if you're not already set up to do
such testing.

How's this?

Andrew
Normalize GOACC_parallel_keyed async and wait parameters

2020-01-30  Andrew Stubbs  <a...@codesourcery.com>
	    Thomas Schwinge  <tho...@codesourcery.com>

	PR middle-end/93488

	gcc/
	* omp-expand.c (expand_omp_target): Use force_gimple_operand_gsi on
	t_async and the wait arguments.

diff --git a/gcc/omp-expand.c b/gcc/omp-expand.c
index cd423ad799e..ec4baf46965 100644
--- a/gcc/omp-expand.c
+++ b/gcc/omp-expand.c
@@ -8418,7 +8418,9 @@ expand_omp_target (struct omp_region *region)
 					      i_async));
 	  }
 	if (t_async)
-	  args.safe_push (t_async);
+	  args.safe_push (force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, t_async, true,
+						    NULL_TREE, true,
+						    GSI_SAME_STMT));
 
 	/* Save the argument index, and ... */
 	unsigned t_wait_idx = args.length ();
@@ -8431,9 +8433,12 @@ expand_omp_target (struct omp_region *region)
 	for (; c; c = OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (c))
 	  if (OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (c) == OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT)
 	    {
-	      args.safe_push (fold_convert_loc (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
-						integer_type_node,
-						OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT_EXPR (c)));
+	      tree arg = fold_convert_loc (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
+					   integer_type_node,
+					   OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT_EXPR (c));
+	      arg = force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, arg, true, NULL_TREE, true,
+					      GSI_SAME_STMT);
+	      args.safe_push (arg);
 	      num_waits++;
 	    }
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/pr93488.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/pr93488.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6fddad919d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/pr93488.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/* PR middle-end/93488
+ 
+   Ensure that wait and async arguments can be cast to the correct type
+   without breaking gimple verification.  */
+
+void test()
+{
+  /* int */ unsigned char a = 1;
+  /* int */ unsigned char w = 1;
+
+#pragma acc parallel wait(w) async(a)
+  ;
+#pragma acc kernels wait(w) async(a)
+  ;
+#pragma acc serial wait(w) async(a)
+  ;
+  int data = 0;
+#pragma acc enter data wait(w) async(a) create(data)
+#pragma acc update wait(w) async(a) device(data)
+#pragma acc exit data wait(w) async(a) delete(data)
+#pragma acc wait(w) async(a)
+}

Reply via email to