Forgot to add the purpose of the e-mail: OK to commit?
On 24/02/2020 12:24, Mark Eggleston wrote:
Please find attached a patch to fix PR93835. This patch ensures that
the array returned by SHAPE has its shape defined, the original patch
from Steve Kargl handled the lack of shape for the returned array.
The bonus white space issues fixed in the original patch have been
retained.
A side affect of the patch is a change in the errors expected by the
test case pr77351.f90. Instead of "Error: Different shape for
elemental binary operation at (1) on dimension 1 (1 and 2)" and
"Error: Array operands are incommensurate at (1)" there is only
"Error: Shapes for operands at (1) and (2) are not conformable" which
is effectively the same.
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
Mark Eggleston <mark.eggles...@codethink.com>
Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/93835
* decl.c (gfc_match_data) : Check whether the data expression
is a derived type and is a constructor. If a BOZ constant
is encountered in the constructor output an error and return
MATCH_ERROR.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Mark Eggleston <mark.eggles...@codethink.com>
PR fortran/93835
* gfortran.dg/pr77351.f90 : Check for one error instead of two.
* gfortran.dg/pr93835.f08 : New test.
--
https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
