On 2/26/20 5:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/25/20 4:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
We consider all TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS distinct types, leading to problems with redeclarations.

I'd think that the bug is that we're treating them as types in the first place; they aren't types, so they shouldn't reach comptypes.  I'd lean toward adding an assert to that effect and fixing the caller to use e.g. template_args_equal.

Thanks, this patch implements that approach.

That TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS are not types, suggests to me that NONTYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS are not expressions. Perhaps their representation should be unified -- I keep encountering code handling them essentially doing the same thing for both kinds. But that's a GCC-11 thing at least.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell
2020-02-27  Nathan Sidwell  <nat...@acm.org>

	PR c++/93933
	* pt.c (template_args_equal): Pass ARGUMENT_PACKS through to
	cp_tree_equal.
	* tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Compare ARGUMENT_PACKS here,
	* typeck.c (comptypes): Assert we don't get any argument packs.

diff --git c/gcc/cp/pt.c w/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 6c9abb8f3d3..622c70b352f 100644
--- c/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ w/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -8999,25 +8999,8 @@ template_args_equal (tree ot, tree nt, bool partial_order /* = false */)
 				    PACK_EXPANSION_PATTERN (nt))
 	    && template_args_equal (PACK_EXPANSION_EXTRA_ARGS (ot),
 				    PACK_EXPANSION_EXTRA_ARGS (nt)));
-  else if (ARGUMENT_PACK_P (ot))
-    {
-      int i, len;
-      tree opack, npack;
-
-      if (!ARGUMENT_PACK_P (nt))
-	return 0;
-
-      opack = ARGUMENT_PACK_ARGS (ot);
-      npack = ARGUMENT_PACK_ARGS (nt);
-      len = TREE_VEC_LENGTH (opack);
-      if (TREE_VEC_LENGTH (npack) != len)
-	return 0;
-      for (i = 0; i < len; ++i)
-	if (!template_args_equal (TREE_VEC_ELT (opack, i),
-				  TREE_VEC_ELT (npack, i)))
-	  return 0;
-      return 1;
-    }
+  else if (ARGUMENT_PACK_P (ot) || ARGUMENT_PACK_P (nt))
+    return cp_tree_equal (ot, nt);
   else if (ot && TREE_CODE (ot) == ARGUMENT_PACK_SELECT)
     gcc_unreachable ();
   else if (TYPE_P (nt))
diff --git c/gcc/cp/tree.c w/gcc/cp/tree.c
index 72b3a720ee8..3fc6287d566 100644
--- c/gcc/cp/tree.c
+++ w/gcc/cp/tree.c
@@ -3857,12 +3857,27 @@ cp_tree_equal (tree t1, tree t2)
 			     DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_PATTERN (t2))
 	      && comp_template_args (DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_ARGS (t1),
 				     DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_ARGS (t2)));
-      break;
 
     case LAMBDA_EXPR:
       /* Two lambda-expressions are never considered equivalent.  */
       return false;
 
+    case TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK:
+    case NONTYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK:
+      {
+	tree p1 = ARGUMENT_PACK_ARGS (t1);
+	tree p2 = ARGUMENT_PACK_ARGS (t2);
+	int len = TREE_VEC_LENGTH (p1);
+	if (TREE_VEC_LENGTH (p2) != len)
+	  return false;
+
+	for (int ix = 0; ix != len; ix++)
+	  if (!template_args_equal (TREE_VEC_ELT (p1, ix),
+				    TREE_VEC_ELT (p2, ix)))
+	    return false;
+	return true;
+      }
+
     default:
       break;
     }
diff --git c/gcc/cp/typeck.c w/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index 42d0b47cf1b..2a3243f3e81 100644
--- c/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ w/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -1485,6 +1485,10 @@ comptypes (tree t1, tree t2, int strict)
 {
   gcc_checking_assert (t1 && t2);
 
+  /* TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACKS are not really types.  */
+  gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (t1) != TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK
+		       && TREE_CODE (t2) != TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK);
+
   if (strict == COMPARE_STRICT && comparing_specializations
       && (t1 != TYPE_CANONICAL (t1) || t2 != TYPE_CANONICAL (t2)))
     /* If comparing_specializations, treat dependent aliases as distinct.  */
diff --git c/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/pr93933.C w/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/pr93933.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b4f2c36374d
--- /dev/null
+++ w/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/pr93933.C
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+// { dg-options "-fconcepts" }
+
+// distilled from <concepts>, via header units
+
+template<typename _ArgTypes>
+struct is_invocable;
+
+template<typename... _Args>
+concept invocable = is_invocable<_Args...>::value;
+
+template<typename _Is>
+requires invocable<_Is>
+class BUG;
+
+template<typename _Is>
+requires invocable<_Is>
+class BUG {}; // { dg-bogus "different constraints" }
+
+template<int> struct is_invocable_NT;
+
+template<int... Ints>
+concept invocable_NT = is_invocable_NT<Ints...>::value;
+
+template<int _Is>
+requires invocable_NT<_Is>
+class BUG_NT;
+
+template<int _Is>
+requires invocable_NT<_Is>
+class BUG_NT {};

Reply via email to