On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 06:53:10PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:57:28PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 03:38:54PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > > > Here are the equivalent changes for PR target/93932 for the GCC 9 branch. > > > I > > > have built both big and little endian PowerPC linux compilers and both > > > bootstrapped. The make check actually fixes the tests that were broken > > > by the > > > register allocation behavior. Can I check these patches into GCC 9? > > > > So what is different in this backport? > > > > Either way, it needs some soaking time first. This patch is not much > > safer than average. > > Fair enough. > > The difference is GCC 9 has all of the old constraints that were eliminated in > the current master branch. > > I.e. the first patch for the current master, uses "wa" for the second > constraint, while GCC 9 used "<VSa>" (which in GCC 9 expanded to "wa" in both > cases).
Ah okay. Thanks. Okay for the 9 branch some time next week, then. Monday perhaps, so that it gets some exposure before the RC? Segher
