Hi.
After r9-1623-gc518c1025b435e1c593a745036fc9b8ed04c5819 the code was changed to:
- if (align_jumps_max_skip <= 0)
- align_jumps_max_skip = 15;
- if (align_loops_max_skip <= 0)
- align_loops_max_skip = 15;
+
+ if (flag_align_jumps && !str_align_jumps)
+ str_align_jumps = "16";
+ if (flag_align_loops && !str_align_loops)
+ str_align_loops = "16";
which for situation where align_* was 0 caused that max_skip didn't play any
role.
My code wrongly changed that to str_align_jumps, which is now the was which
includes
both alignment (and max skip). The hunk should not be here.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-03-05 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
PR target/93800
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal):
Remove set of str_align_loops and str_align_jumps as these
should be set in previous 2 conditions in the function.
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
index ecbf7ae0c59..848a4ef451e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
@@ -4363,11 +4363,6 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_p)
str_align_loops = "16";
}
}
-
- if (flag_align_jumps && !str_align_jumps)
- str_align_jumps = "16";
- if (flag_align_loops && !str_align_loops)
- str_align_loops = "16";
}
/* Arrange to save and restore machine status around nested functions. */
