Hi! On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 05:18:21PM +0100, J.W. Jagersma wrote: > The only question I have left now is if my proposed change to the > documentation is acceptable or should be expanded/reworded.
I think it is fine. It's easier to judge if you look fresh at it, in my experience, so I might think differently at stage1 time ;-) > There is also still the question of whether non-volatile asms should be > allowed to throw or not. I don't know if that should be discussed here > or on the PR. I think you should just allow it. But almost always an asm that can throw *should* be volatile, or else the compiler might optimise it away in unexpected cases, etc. Segher
