On 2020/3/10 05:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:21:58AM -0600, luo...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
From: Xionghu Luo <luo...@linux.ibm.com>
Backport the patch to fix failures on P9 and P8BE, P7LE for PR94036.
No changes were needed?
Yes, no conflicts of the patch and instruction counts are same with
master. Committed in r9-8357(85c08558c66dd8e2000a4ad282ca03368028fce3).
Thanks
Xionghu
Tested pass on P9/P8/P7, ok to commit?
Yes, okay for 9. Thanks!
Segher
2020-03-05 Luo Xiong Hu <luo...@linux.ibm.com>
backport from master.
PR testsuite/94036
2019-12-02 Luo Xiong Hu <luo...@linux.ibm.com>
PR testsuite/92398
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr72804.c: Split the store function to...
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h: ... this one. New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c: New.
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c: New.
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_p8): New.
(check_effective_target_p9+): New.
