FWIW this change needs a pairing glibc change so must NOT be included for 
upcoming
2020.x release which still has old version of glibc !

-Vineet


On 3/31/20 10:57 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Well its a hard requirement considering glibc is still using gcc-9 !
>
> Thx,
> -Vineet
>
> On 3/31/20 9:26 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> Hi Claus,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: linux-snps-arc <linux-snps-arc-boun...@lists.infradead.org> On Behalf 
>>> Of Claudiu Zissulescu
>>> Ianculescu
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:07 PM
>>> To: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
>>> Cc: linux-snps-...@lists.infradead.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Claudiu 
>>> Zissulescu
>>> <claz...@synopsys.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARC] Allow more ABIs in GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER
>>>
>>> Pushed.
>> Is this one eligible for being back-ported to older GCCs?
>> At least GCC 9.x would be really good.
>>
>> -Alexey
>>  
> _______________________________________________
> linux-snps-arc mailing list
> linux-snps-...@lists.infradead.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_mailman_listinfo_linux-2Dsnps-2Darc&d=DwICAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=c14YS-cH-kdhTOW89KozFhBtBJgs1zXscZojEZQ0THs&m=xnl4FBxLN70UDZIvD2NTxyfPAenrfQsdij0DBuPImCI&s=YnG2GxYtFIbUU0FesR19TV7fz0ILe8xncKLnRiqBhOc&e=
>  

Reply via email to