Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes: > Hi, > > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we > generate > nonsecure2: > b nonsecure0 > > which is OK, but does not match the currently expected > nonsecure2: > ... > bl __gnu_cmse_nonsecure_call > > (see https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/543190.html) > > The test has already different expectations for v8-M and v8.1-M. > > I've decided to try to use check-function-bodies to account for the > different possibilities: > - v8-M vs v8.1-M via two different prefixes > - code generation variants (-0?) via multiple regexps > > I've tested that the test now passes with --target-board=-march=armv8-m.main > and --target-board=-march=armv8.1-m.main. > > I feel this a bit too much of a burden for the purpose, maybe there's > a better way of handling all these alternatives (in particular, > there's a lot of duplication since the expected code for the secure* > functions is the same for v8-M and v8.1-M).
FWIW, an alternative is to give multiple versions with the same prefix and use { target ... } to select between them. E.g.: /* ** foo: { target a } ** ... */ /* ** foo: { target { ! a } } ** ... */ Thanks, Richard