Andrew,
On 09.4.2020 00:50 , Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:06 AM Anton Youdkevitch
<anton.youdkevi...@bell-sw.com> wrote:
Here is the patch introducing thunderxt311 maching model
for the scheduler. A name for the new chip was added to the
list of the names to be recognized as a valid parameter for mcpu
and mtune flags. The TX2 cost model was reused for TX3.
It might make sense to use thunderx3 instead of thunderx3t11 now.
The main reason why I had used thunderx2t99 was because there was
going to be 2 Thunderx2 with two different costs but the second one
turned into OcteonTX2 instead.
We will revisited this. Thanks for the suggestion!
--
Anton
