Hello Jeff,
On 08/04/2020 22:24, Jeff Law wrote:
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 19:47 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Add a start/end file specification if the -qrtems option is present.
Allow targets to customize it.
Support the standard -nodefaultlibs option.
gcc/
* config/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Define if undefined.
(RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
(STARTFILE_SPEC): Update comment. Add RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC.
(ENDFILE_SPEC): Add RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC.
(LIB_SPECS): Support -nodefaultlibs option.
* config/or1k/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Define.
(RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
* config/rs6000/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
(RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
* config/v850/rtems.h (RTEMS_STARTFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
(RTEMS_ENDFILE_SPEC): Likewise.
How important is it to get this into gcc-10? We're well into stage4 at this
point and while we do have leeway with a patch like this we do want to be
selective about what we accept.
If it's important, then OK, otherwise please defer it to gcc-11, where it's pre-
approved.
would it be all right to commit it to the trunk once the GCC 11
development starts and then back port it for GCC 10.2 after a while?
