On 4/20/20 4:44 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:51:59AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/17/20 4:28 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
As an extension (there should be a CWG about this though), we support
braced-init-list as a template argument, but convert_nontype_argument
had trouble digesting them.  We ICEd because of the double coercion we
perform for template arguments: convert_nontype_argument called from
finish_template_type got a { }, and since a class type was involved and
we were in a template, convert_like created an IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR.  Then
the second conversion of the same argument crashed in constexpr.c
because the IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR had gotten wrapped in a TARGET_EXPR.
Another issue was that an IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR leaked to constexpr.c when
building an aggregate init.

We should have instantiated the IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR in the first call to
convert_nontype_argument, but we didn't, because the call to
is_nondependent_constant_expression returned false because it checks
!BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P.  Then non_dep was false even though the
expression didn't contain anything dependent and we didn't instantiate
it in convert_nontype_argument.  I'm not sure what the point
of that BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P. check was, but removing it doesn't
break anything and fixes these crashes.

The point was to avoid trying to get a constant value for an untyped
braced-init-list.  I'm happy to remove the check from these functions, but
let's add it back to maybe_constant_{value,init}, where it was until
r6-7825-geb07f187a471f9a203626aecced17d6947c3cc46 .

Thanks for the pointer.

Or better, put it in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr.

Done here.  Since we didn't set non_constant_p and emit an error, I'm not
doing it here, either.

Hmm, maybe checking_assert allow_non_constant to make sure we don't need an error. OK with that change.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --
As an extension (there should be a CWG about this though), we support
braced-init-list as a template argument, but convert_nontype_argument
had trouble digesting them.  We ICEd because of the double coercion we
perform for template arguments: convert_nontype_argument called from
finish_template_type got a { }, and since a class type was involved and
we were in a template, convert_like created an IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR.  Then
the second conversion of the same argument crashed in constexpr.c
because the IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR had gotten wrapped in a TARGET_EXPR.
Another issue was that an IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR leaked to constexpr.c when
building an aggregate init.

We should have instantiated the IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR in the first call to
convert_nontype_argument, but we didn't, because the call to
is_nondependent_constant_expression returned false because it checks
!BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P.  Then non_dep was false even though the
expression didn't contain anything dependent and we didn't instantiate
it in convert_nontype_argument.  To fix this, check
BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr rather
than in is_nondependent_*.

        PR c++/94592
        * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr): Return when T is
        a BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P.
        (is_nondependent_constant_expression): Don't check
        BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P.
        (is_nondependent_static_init_expression): Likewise.

        * g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class34.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class35.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/constexpr.c                           |  5 +++--
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class34.C | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class35.C | 17 +++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class34.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class35.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index c8e7d083f40..fa592834f0a 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -6534,6 +6534,9 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool 
allow_non_constant,
    bool non_constant_p = false;
    bool overflow_p = false;
+ if (BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (t))
+    return t;
+
    constexpr_global_ctx global_ctx;
    constexpr_ctx ctx = { &global_ctx, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
                        allow_non_constant, strict,
@@ -8295,7 +8298,6 @@ bool
  is_nondependent_constant_expression (tree t)
  {
    return (!type_unknown_p (t)
-         && !BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (t)
          && is_constant_expression (t)
          && !instantiation_dependent_expression_p (t));
  }
@@ -8307,7 +8309,6 @@ bool
  is_nondependent_static_init_expression (tree t)
  {
    return (!type_unknown_p (t)
-         && !BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (t)
          && is_static_init_expression (t)
          && !instantiation_dependent_expression_p (t));
  }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class34.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class34.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2d3ba018618
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class34.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/94592 - ICE with { } as template argument.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
+
+struct A {
+  constexpr A() {}
+};
+
+template <A> struct B { };
+
+template<typename> void bar () {
+    B<{}> var;
+}
+
+void fu() {
+    bar<int>();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class35.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class35.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..78cf0a39c81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class35.C
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/94592 - ICE with { } as template argument.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
+
+struct A {
+    int i;
+    constexpr A(int n) : i(n) {}
+};
+
+template <A a> struct B { int i; constexpr B() : i(a.i) { } };
+
+template<typename> void bar () {
+    B<{1}> var;
+}
+
+void fu() {
+    bar<int>();
+}

base-commit: 5bdd4c5d3fc9c143e8edea3b10828e4b75d7a385


Reply via email to