On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:26:32PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 5/5/20 6:17 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > An ICE arises here because we call cp_get_callee_fndecl_nofold in a
> > template, and we've got a CALL_EXPR whose CALL_EXPR_FN is a BASELINK.
> > This tickles the INDIRECT_TYPE_P assert in cp_get_fndecl_from_callee.
> > 
> > Jakub said in the PR that he'd hit a similar problem too and dealt
> > with it in omp_declare_variant_finalize_one.  I considered tweaking
> > is_std_constant_evaluated_p to return false for a BASELINK, since the
> > std::is_constant_evaluated call we're looking for can't be a member
> > function, but perhaps we could get another unexpected CALL_EXPR and
> > crash the same.  In which case it might be better to make out the
> > omp_* code into a new routine and use that, as below.
> 
> Why not adjust cp_get_fndecl_from_callee to, say, return null instead of
> aborting when !INDIRECT_TYPE_P?

It's often hard (for me, anyway) to decide if an assert should stay or can
be turned into a condition.  In this case we could argue that initially
cp_get_fndecl_from_callee wasn't meant to be called in a template, but now
we have reasonable use cases where it actually is called in a template, so
should cope instead of crashing.  Is that a fair assesment?

I suspect one could argue that if we see a BASELINK, we might want to use
BASELINK_FUNCTIONS to get the FUNCTION_DECL, but I don't have a test where
that would make a difference.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/10.2?

-- >8 --
An ICE arises here because we call cp_get_callee_fndecl_nofold in a
template, and we've got a CALL_EXPR whose CALL_EXPR_FN is a BASELINK.
This tickles the INDIRECT_TYPE_P assert in cp_get_fndecl_from_callee.

Fixed by turning the assert into a condition and returning NULL_TREE
in that case.

        PR c++/94937
        * cvt.c (cp_get_fndecl_from_callee): Return NULL_TREE if the function
        type is not INDIRECT_TYPE_P.
        * decl.c (omp_declare_variant_finalize_one): Call
        cp_get_callee_fndecl_nofold instead of looking for the function decl
        manually.

        * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if34.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated10.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/cvt.c                                  |  3 +-
 gcc/cp/decl.c                                 | 12 +-------
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if34.C   | 15 ++++++++++
 .../g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated10.C    | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if34.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated10.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cvt.c b/gcc/cp/cvt.c
index 656e7fd3ec0..371002833d0 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cvt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/cvt.c
@@ -995,9 +995,8 @@ cp_get_fndecl_from_callee (tree fn, bool fold /* = true */)
   if (TREE_CODE (fn) == FUNCTION_DECL)
     return fn;
   tree type = TREE_TYPE (fn);
-  if (type == unknown_type_node)
+  if (type == NULL_TREE || !INDIRECT_TYPE_P (type))
     return NULL_TREE;
-  gcc_assert (INDIRECT_TYPE_P (type));
   if (fold)
     fn = maybe_constant_init (fn);
   STRIP_NOPS (fn);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 232d7ed4a14..cbdef3e3365 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -7297,17 +7297,7 @@ omp_declare_variant_finalize_one (tree decl, tree attr)
   if (variant == error_mark_node && !processing_template_decl)
     return true;
 
-  variant = cp_get_callee (variant);
-  if (variant)
-    {
-      if (TREE_CODE (variant) == FUNCTION_DECL)
-       ;
-      else if (TREE_TYPE (variant) && INDIRECT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (variant)))
-       variant = cp_get_fndecl_from_callee (variant, false);
-      else
-       variant = NULL_TREE;
-    }
-
+  variant = cp_get_callee_fndecl_nofold (variant);
   input_location = save_loc;
 
   if (variant)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if34.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if34.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6e0b2597a53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if34.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/94937 - ICE with -Wall and constexpr if.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wall" }
+
+struct B {
+  static constexpr bool foo() { return false; }
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+struct C {
+  static void bar ()
+  {
+    if constexpr (B::foo()) ;
+  }
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated10.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated10.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7b2e345f448
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/is-constant-evaluated10.C
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
+// { dg-options "-Wtautological-compare" }
+
+namespace std {
+  constexpr inline bool
+  is_constant_evaluated () noexcept
+  {
+    return __builtin_is_constant_evaluated ();
+  }
+}
+
+template<typename>
+constexpr int
+foo(int i)
+{
+  if constexpr (std::is_constant_evaluated ()) // { dg-warning 
".std::is_constant_evaluated. always evaluates to true in .if constexpr." }
+    return 42;
+  else
+    return i;
+}
+
+template<typename>
+constexpr int
+foo2(int i)
+{
+  if constexpr (__builtin_is_constant_evaluated ()) // { dg-warning 
".std::is_constant_evaluated. always evaluates to true in .if constexpr." }
+    return 42;
+  else
+    return i;
+}

base-commit: 9cd70f3f0fa45cbe899da5ecd0b0c6da0657fd62
-- 
Marek Polacek • Red Hat, Inc. • 300 A St, Boston, MA

Reply via email to