> OTOH, you don't need to name Tuple at all... It should not *have* a > constructor, since you declared it as class... But you can just use > std::tuple here?
I thought of using std::tuple but it requires c++11 support. I am not sure we always build gcc with c++11? > > > (emit_library_call): Added default arg unsigned_p. > > (emit_library_call_value): Added default arg unsigned_p. > > Yeah, eww. Default arguments have all the problems you had before, > except now it is hidden and much more surprising. > > Those functions really should take rtx_mode_t arguments? I was thinking the same. will incorporate this. ./kamlesh