On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 15:53 -0400, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> These tests make sure that PC-relative variant is generated for -mcpu=future
> on
> systems that support PC-relative addressing.
>
> 2020-06-01 Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-dd.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-df.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-di.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-hi.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-kf.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-qi.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-sd.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-sf.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-si.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-udi.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-uhi.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-uqi.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-usi.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-v2df.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel.h: Include file for new tests.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-dd.c | 13 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-df.c | 13 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-di.c | 13 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-hi.c | 13 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-kf.c | 13 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-qi.c | 13 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-sd.c | 16 +++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-sf.c | 13 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-si.c | 13 ++++++
> .../gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-udi.c | 13 ++++++
> .../gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-uhi.c | 13 ++++++
> .../gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-uqi.c | 13 ++++++
> .../gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-usi.c | 13 ++++++
> .../gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-v2df.c | 13 ++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel.h | 52
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 15 files changed, 237 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-dd.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-df.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-di.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-hi.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-kf.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-qi.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-sd.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-sf.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-si.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-udi.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-uhi.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-uqi.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-usi.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-v2df.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel.h
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-dd.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-dd.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f100c24
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-pcrel-dd.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_pcrel } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=future" } */
> +
> +/* Tests for prefixed instructions testing whether pc-relative prefixed
> + instructions are generated for the _Decimal64 type. */
Similar/same comment as was made in Apr. I recommend something like
"Test whether pc-relative prefixed instructions
are generated for the _Decimal64 type."
