On 6/12/20 4:06 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote:

Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:

On 6/8/20 5:17 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:

+      r = gro_is_void_p ? integer_zero_node : rvalue (gro);
+      /* The return object is constructed, even if the gro is void.  */

Would error_mark_node work here?  I presume we've already diagnosed the 
problem, so will result in no cascade of errors.

We have not diagnosed the problem - it’s valid to have a void g-r-o and a 
non-void function
return.

I am not sure the circumstance has been identified specifically where this 
(valid) permutation
is found together with a specialization of the traits that has a non-class 
return type. (I spotted
this as a corner-case while working on the code).

Perhaps I should construct a test-case and see how the other compilers handle 
it.

I did this anyway …

To answer your original question, we need to diagnose this specifically.
clang does so, I’ve now matched the diagnostic for GCC.
we can then propagate an error_mark_node onwards.

OK now?
Iain

ok, thanks!


===

The PR reports that we fail to destroy the object initially created from
the get-return-object call.  Fixed by adding a cleanup when the DTOR is
non-trivial.  In addition, to meet the specific wording that the call to
get_return_object creates the glvalue for the return, we must construct
that in-place in the return object to avoid a second copy/move CTOR.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/95477
        * coroutines.cc (morph_fn_to_coro): Apply a cleanup to
        the get return object when the DTOR is non-trivial.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/95477
        * g++.dg/coroutines/pr95477.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/coroutines/void-gro-non-class-coro.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/coroutines.cc                          | 69 ++++++++++++++++---
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/pr95477.C     | 37 ++++++++++
  .../coroutines/void-gro-non-class-coro.C      | 59 ++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/pr95477.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/void-gro-non-class-coro.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
index 11fca9954ac..d4f582e91e2 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
@@ -4280,12 +4280,34 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree 
*destroyer)
tree gro = NULL_TREE;
    tree gro_bind_vars = NULL_TREE;
+  tree gro_cleanup_stmt = NULL_TREE;
    /* We have to sequence the call to get_return_object before initial
       suspend.  */
    if (gro_is_void_p)
-    finish_expr_stmt (get_ro);
+    r = get_ro;
+  else if (same_type_p (gro_type, fn_return_type))
+    {
+     /* [dcl.fct.def.coroutine] / 7
+       The expression promise.get_return_object() is used to initialize the
+       glvalue result or... (see below)
+       Construct the return result directly.  */
+      if (TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING (gro_type))
+       {
+         vec<tree, va_gc> *arg = make_tree_vector_single (get_ro);
+         r = build_special_member_call (DECL_RESULT (orig),
+                                        complete_ctor_identifier,
+                                        &arg, gro_type, LOOKUP_NORMAL,
+                                        tf_warning_or_error);
+         release_tree_vector (arg);
+       }
+      else
+       r = build2_loc (fn_start, INIT_EXPR, gro_type,
+                       DECL_RESULT (orig), get_ro);
+    }
    else
      {
+      /* ... or ... Construct an object that will be used as the single
+       param to the CTOR for the return object.  */
        gro = build_lang_decl (VAR_DECL, get_identifier ("coro.gro"), gro_type);
        DECL_CONTEXT (gro) = current_scope ();
        DECL_ARTIFICIAL (gro) = true;
@@ -4302,8 +4324,21 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree 
*destroyer)
        }
        else
        r = build2_loc (fn_start, INIT_EXPR, gro_type, gro, get_ro);
-      finish_expr_stmt (r);
+      /* The constructed object might require a cleanup.  */
+      if (TYPE_HAS_NONTRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR (gro_type))
+       {
+         tree cleanup
+           = build_special_member_call (gro, complete_dtor_identifier,
+                                        NULL, gro_type, LOOKUP_NORMAL,
+                                        tf_warning_or_error);
+         gro_cleanup_stmt = build_stmt (input_location, CLEANUP_STMT, NULL,
+                                        cleanup, gro);
+       }
      }
+  finish_expr_stmt (r);
+
+  if (gro_cleanup_stmt)
+    CLEANUP_BODY (gro_cleanup_stmt) = push_stmt_list ();
/* Initialize the resume_idx_name to 0, meaning "not started". */
    tree resume_idx_m
@@ -4345,16 +4380,15 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree 
*destroyer)
       promise was constructed.  We now supply a reference to that var,
       either as the return value (if it's the same type) or to the CTOR
       for an object of the return type.  */
-  if (gro_is_void_p)
-    r = NULL_TREE;
-  else
-    r = rvalue (gro);
- if (!same_type_p (gro_type, fn_return_type))
+  if (same_type_p (gro_type, fn_return_type))
+    r = gro_is_void_p ? NULL_TREE : DECL_RESULT (orig);
+  else
      {
-      /* The return object is , even if the gro is void.  */
        if (CLASS_TYPE_P (fn_return_type))
        {
+         /* For class type return objects, we can attempt to construct,
+            even if the gro is void.  */
          vec<tree, va_gc> *args = NULL;
          vec<tree, va_gc> **arglist = NULL;
          if (!gro_is_void_p)
@@ -4370,12 +4404,27 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree 
*destroyer)
          if (args)
            release_tree_vector (args);
        }
-      else /* ??? suppose we have non-class return and void gro?  */
-       r = build1_loc (input_location, CONVERT_EXPR, fn_return_type, r);
+      else if (gro_is_void_p)
+       {
+         /* We can't initialize a non-class return value from void.  */
+         error_at (input_location, "cannot initialize a return object of type"
+                   " %qT with an rvalue of type %<void%>", fn_return_type);
+         r = error_mark_node;
+       }
+      else
+       r = build1_loc (input_location, CONVERT_EXPR,
+                       fn_return_type, rvalue (gro));
      }
finish_return_stmt (r); + if (gro_cleanup_stmt)
+    {
+      CLEANUP_BODY (gro_cleanup_stmt)
+        = pop_stmt_list (CLEANUP_BODY (gro_cleanup_stmt));
+      add_stmt (gro_cleanup_stmt);
+    }
+
    /* Finish up the ramp function.  */
    BIND_EXPR_VARS (gro_context_bind) = gro_bind_vars;
    BIND_EXPR_BODY (gro_context_bind) = pop_stmt_list (gro_context_body);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/pr95477.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/pr95477.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7050aee0078
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/pr95477.C
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+//  { dg-do run }
+
+#include "coro.h"
+
+struct simple {
+  static inline int alive = 0;
+  simple() { ++alive; }
+  simple(simple&&) { ++alive; }
+  ~simple() { --alive; }
+
+  struct promise_type {
+    simple get_return_object() { return simple{}; }
+    void return_void() {}
+    void unhandled_exception() {}
+    auto initial_suspend() noexcept { return coro::suspend_never{}; }
+    auto final_suspend() noexcept { return coro::suspend_never{}; }
+  };
+};
+
+simple
+f()
+{
+  co_return;
+}
+
+int main() {
+  {
+    f();
+  }
+
+  if (simple::alive != 0)
+   {
+     PRINTF ("something wrong with dtors: %d\n", simple::alive);
+     abort ();
+   }
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/void-gro-non-class-coro.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/void-gro-non-class-coro.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d9e53fe4c76
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/void-gro-non-class-coro.C
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// Test handling of the case where we have a void g-r-o and a non-void
+// and non-class-type ramp return.
+
+#include "coro.h"
+
+int g_promise = -1;
+
+template<typename R, typename HandleRef, typename ...T>
+struct std::coroutine_traits<R, HandleRef, T...> {
+    struct promise_type {
+        promise_type (HandleRef h, T ...args)
+        { h = std::coroutine_handle<promise_type>::from_promise (*this);
+          PRINT ("Created Promise");
+          g_promise = 1;
+        }
+       ~promise_type () { PRINT ("Destroyed Promise"); g_promise = 0;}
+        void get_return_object() {}
+
+        auto initial_suspend() {
+          return std::suspend_always{};
+         }
+        auto final_suspend() { return std::suspend_never{}; }
+
+        void return_void() {}
+        void unhandled_exception() {}
+    };
+};
+
+int
+my_coro (std::coroutine_handle<>& h)
+{
+  PRINT ("coro1: about to return");
+  co_return;
+} // dg-error {cannot initialize a return object of type ‘int’ with an rvalue 
of type ‘void’}
+
+int main ()
+{
+  std::coroutine_handle<> h;
+  int t = my_coro (h);
+
+  if (h.done())
+    {
+      PRINT ("main: apparently was already done...");
+      abort ();
+    }
+
+  // initial suspend.
+  h.resume ();
+
+  // The coro should have self-destructed.
+  if (g_promise)
+    {
+      PRINT ("main: apparently we did not complete...");
+      abort ();
+    }
+
+  PRINT ("main: returning");
+  return 0;
+}



--
Nathan Sidwell

Reply via email to