On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 05:56 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 8:24 PM Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 04:55 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > Currently patchable area is at the wrong place.  It is placed immediately
> > > after function label, before both .cfi_startproc and ENDBR.  This patch
> > > adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for pseudo patchable area instruction and
> > > changes ENDBR insertion pass to also insert patchable area instruction.
> > > TARGET_ASM_PRINT_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY is defined to avoid placing
> > > patchable area before .cfi_startproc and ENDBR.
> > > 
> > > OK for master?
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > H.J.
> > > ---
> > > gcc/
> > > 
> > >       PR target/93492
> > >       * config/i386/i386-features.c (rest_of_insert_endbranch):
> > >       Renamed to ...
> > >       (rest_of_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area): Change return type
> > >       to void. Add need_endbr and patchable_area_size arguments.
> > >       Don't call timevar_push nor timevar_pop.  Replace
> > >       endbr_queued_at_entrance with insn_queued_at_entrance.  Insert
> > >       UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for patchable area.
> > >       (pass_data_insert_endbranch): Renamed to ...
> > >       (pass_data_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area): This.  Change
> > >       pass name to endbr_and_patchable_area.
> > >       (pass_insert_endbranch): Renamed to ...
> > >       (pass_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area): This.  Add need_endbr
> > >       and patchable_area_size;.
> > >       (pass_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area::gate): Set and check
> > >       need_endbr and patchable_area_size.
> > >       (pass_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area::execute): Call
> > >       timevar_push and timevar_pop.  Pass need_endbr and
> > >       patchable_area_size to rest_of_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area.
> > >       (make_pass_insert_endbranch): Renamed to ...
> > >       (make_pass_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area): This.
> > >       * config/i386/i386-passes.def: Replace pass_insert_endbranch
> > >       with pass_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area.
> > >       * config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_output_patchable_area): New.
> > >       (make_pass_insert_endbranch): Renamed to ...
> > >       (make_pass_insert_endbr_and_patchable_area): This.
> > >       * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_asm_output_function_label): Set
> > >       function_label_emitted to true.
> > >       (ix86_print_patchable_function_entry): New function.
> > >       (ix86_output_patchable_area): Likewise.
> > >       (x86_function_profiler): Replace endbr_queued_at_entrance with
> > >       insn_queued_at_entrance.  Generate ENDBR only for TYPE_ENDBR.
> > >       Call ix86_output_patchable_area to generate patchable area if
> > >       needed.
> > >       (TARGET_ASM_PRINT_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY): New.
> > >       * i386.h (queued_insn_type): New.
> > >       (machine_function): Add function_label_emitted.  Replace
> > >       endbr_queued_at_entrance with insn_queued_at_entrance.
> > >       * config/i386/i386.md (UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA): New.
> > >       (patchable_area): New.
> > > 
> > > gcc/testsuite/
> > > 
> > >       PR target/93492
> > >       * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-1.c: New test.
> > >       * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-2.c: Likewise.
> > >       * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-3.c: Likewise.
> > >       * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-4.c: Likewise.
> > >       * gcc.target/i386/pr93492-5.c: Likewise.
> > OK
> > jeff
> 
> My patch triggered a latent x86 backend bug.   This patch fixes
> it.  OK for master?
OK
jeff

Reply via email to