Re: [C++ Patch] deprecation of access declarations

[Jason Merrill]

On 12/30/2011 04:34 PM, Mike Stump wrote:

So, I'm wondering why it was done this way originally:

-  static int S1;               // ERROR - uses same name 9.3
+  static int S1;               // { dg-error "" } uses same name 9.3

and not:

-  static int S1;               // ERROR - uses same name 9.3
+  static int S1;               // { dg-error "uses same name 9.3" }

"uses same name 9.3" sounds like a comment, not error text.

Jason