Hi Harald,
As Dominique pointed out in the PR, the committed patch (part 1) fixed only
one of the provided testcases, but not the original one. That turned out
to be a long and winding road, requiring further checks for NULL pointer
dereferences.
The resulting attached changes have been regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
and confirmed on Darwin by Dominique (thanks!), see PR.
OK for master / where appropriate?
OK for master.
This is not a regression, so I don't think we will need a backport.
Best regards
Thomas
