On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 01/02/2012 02:49 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: >> >> On 01/01/2012 08:10 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >>> >>> The analysis is confirmed by the fact that the rather heavy handed >>> patchlet which I'm attaching, which uses copy_node to avoid the >>> corruption, "works". How do we normally handle this kind of situation? >> >> In most cases, trees are unshared at instantiation time, but that doesn't >> apply to constants like this. The patch is OK. > > Oh I see, thanks. Then I'm going to properly test it, etc, and if everything > goes well, I'll post what I will actually commit.
I think it's enough to call copy_node for CONSTANT_CLASS_P objects. > Thanks again, > Paolo.
