On Jul 23, 2020, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020, Zhanghaijian (A) wrote:
>> # This option restores naming of aux and dump output files
>> # after input files when multiple input files are named,
>> # instead of getting them combined with the output name.

> Does it actually do what the above comment suggests?

It should.  When there are multiple inputs, it clearly does.  I guess
it's just as clear I haven't tried it with a single input.

> I'd have naiively assumed that for gcc -S t.c -fdump-tree-optimized
> -dumpbase "" I get a ".238t.optimized" file (thus empty dumpbase).

Uhh, I guess that would be a reasonable expectation, more so if combined
with -dumpdir, but the documentation suggests -dumpbase "" is to restore
pre-revamp behavior.  Should we change that?


Here's a patch that adds some more tests, fixes the misbehavior, and
adds comments to conditions that led me down investigations that wasted
a lot of time while looking into this problem and trying to make for
more widespread changes.

Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?


[PR96230] some -dumpbase-ext fixes

From: Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com>

The initial bug report was that compiling (-c) with -dumpbase ""
-dumpbase-ext .<ext> crashes the driver.

The verification of -dumpbase-ext against -dumpbase doesn't cover the
case in which -dumpbase activates backward-compatibility mode.

I added a test for that, and for -dumpbase-ext without -dumpbase,
trying to make it work in a sensible way, as if applied to the default
-dumpbase for each file.  It turned out that this made for too much
complexity in dealing with suffixes derived from input filenames, so I
gave that up and returned to discarding -dumpbase-ext as documented,
ending up with a change identical to that in the original bug report.

I also thought I caught an off-by-one error in the initial
verification, that caused dumpbase_ext to be discarded if it was
identical to the specified dumpbase, but that turned out to be
intentional as well, so I put in comments and a test to reflect it.

Finally, an earlier version of the newly-added tests used "$var.ext"
in an expected output list, which showed me the handling of string
expansion was incorrect.  Reworked the expr into an eval to make that
work, and, absent any reliance on post-eval adjustments to so-expanded
output names, I arranged for the adjustments to be skipped after eval.


Co-Authored-By: "Zhanghaijian (A)" <z.zhanghaij...@huawei.com>
for  gcc/ChangeLog

        PR driver/96230
        * gcc.c (process_command): Adjust and document conditions to
        reset dumpbase_ext.

for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

        PR driver/96230
        * gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp: Add tests with -dumpbase-ext,
        with identical -dumpbase, with -dumpbase "", and without any
        -dumpbase.
        (outest): Fix "" expansion in expected outputs, skip
        adjustments.
---
 gcc/gcc.c                                |   15 +++++++++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp |   23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gcc.c b/gcc/gcc.c
index c0eb3c1..10bc988 100644
--- a/gcc/gcc.c
+++ b/gcc/gcc.c
@@ -4907,6 +4907,9 @@ process_command (unsigned int decoded_options_count,
       int lendb = strlen (dumpbase);
       int lendbx = strlen (dumpbase_ext);
 
+      /* -dumpbase-ext must be a suffix proper; discard it if it
+         matches all of -dumpbase, as that would make for an empty
+         basename.  */
       if (lendbx >= lendb
          || strcmp (dumpbase + lendb - lendbx, dumpbase_ext) != 0)
        {
@@ -5083,10 +5086,18 @@ process_command (unsigned int decoded_options_count,
   /* Check that dumpbase_ext, if still present, still matches the end
      of dumpbase, if present, and drop it otherwise.  We only retained
      it above when dumpbase was absent to maybe use it to drop the
-     extension from output_name before combining it with dumpdir.  */
+     extension from output_name before combining it with dumpdir.  We
+     won't deal with -dumpbase-ext when -dumpbase is not explicitly
+     given, even if just to activate backward-compatible dumpbase:
+     dropping it on the floor is correct, expected and documented
+     behavior.  Attempting to deal with a -dumpbase-ext that might
+     match the end of some input filename, or of the combination of
+     the output basename with the suffix of the input filename,
+     possible with an intermediate .gk extension for -fcompare-debug,
+     is just calling for trouble.  */
   if (dumpbase_ext)
     {
-      if (!dumpbase)
+      if (!dumpbase || !*dumpbase)
        {
          free (dumpbase_ext);
          dumpbase_ext = NULL;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp
index 0784a8e..1e3cd41 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp
@@ -137,11 +137,9 @@ proc outest { test sources opts dirs outputs } {
 
            if { [string match "\[\$\"\]" [string index $og 0]] } {
                global aout
-               set og [expr $og]
-               if { "$og" == "" } { continue }
-           }
-
-           if { [string index $og 0] == "-" } then {
+               eval set o $og
+               if { "$o" == "" } { continue }
+           } elseif { [string index $og 0] == "-" } then {
                if { [string index $og 1] == "-" \
                     || [string index $og 1] == "." } then {
                    set o "$b-$b[string range $og 1 end]"
@@ -723,6 +721,21 @@ outest "$b lto st mult namedb" $mult "-o dir/$b.exe 
-save-temps -O2 -flto -flto-
 # !$skip_lto
 }
 
+# PR96230 - -dumpbase "" with -dumpbase-ext, not linking
+outest "$b single  -c  -o -db'' -dbx.c" $sing "-c -o dir/$b.o -dumpbase \"\" 
-dumpbase-ext .c -fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf" {dir/} 
{{-0.c.???r.final -0.su !!$gspd -0.dwo !0 .o} {}}
+outest "$b mult  -c  -dd -db'' -dbx.c" $mult "-c -dumpdir dir/ -dumpbase \"\" 
-dumpbase-ext .c -fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf" {dir/} 
{{-1.c.???r.final -1.su !!$gspd -1.dwo !0 -2.c.???r.final -2.su !!$gspd -2.dwo} 
{-1.o -2.o}}
+outest "$b single  -c  -o -db'' -dbx.x" $sing "-c -o dir/$b.o -dumpbase \"\" 
-dumpbase-ext .x -fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf" {dir/} 
{{-0.c.???r.final -0.su !!$gspd -0.dwo !0 .o} {}}
+outest "$b mult  -c  -dd -db'' -dbx.x" $mult "-c -dumpdir dir/ -dumpbase \"\" 
-dumpbase-ext .x -fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf" {dir/} 
{{-1.c.???r.final -1.su !!$gspd -1.dwo !0 -2.c.???r.final -2.su !!$gspd -2.dwo} 
{-1.o -2.o}}
+# Test -dumpbase-ext without an explicit -dumpbase too.
+outest "$b single  -c  -o -dbx.c" $sing "-c -o dir/$b.o -dumpbase-ext .c 
-fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf" {dir/} {{.c.???r.final .su 
!!$gspd .dwo !0 .o} {}}
+outest "$b mult  -c  -dd -dbx.c" $mult "-c -dumpdir dir/ -dumpbase-ext .c 
-fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf" {dir/} {{-1.c.???r.final -1.su 
!!$gspd -1.dwo !0 -2.c.???r.final -2.su !!$gspd -2.dwo} {-1.o -2.o}}
+outest "$b single  -c  -o -dbx.x" $sing "-c -o dir/$b.o -dumpbase-ext .x 
-fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf" {dir/} {{.c.???r.final .su 
!!$gspd .dwo !0 .o} {}}
+outest "$b mult  -c  -dd -dbx.x" $mult "-c -dumpdir dir/ -dumpbase-ext .x 
-fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf" {dir/} {{-1.c.???r.final -1.su 
!!$gspd -1.dwo !0 -2.c.???r.final -2.su !!$gspd -2.dwo} {-1.o -2.o}}
+outest "$b obj compare-debug save-temps -dbx.x" $sing "-c -fcompare-debug 
-save-temps -fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage $gsplit_dwarf -fdump-final-insns 
-dumpbase-ext .x" {} {{-0.c.???r.final -0.su -0.i -0.c.gkd -0.s -0.gk.i 
-0.gk.c.???r.final -0.gk.c.gkd !!$gspd -0.dwo !0 -0.o}}
+# -dumpbase-ext is dropped if identical to -dumpbase.
+outest "$b asm db=dbext 1" $sing "-S -fdump-rtl-final -fstack-usage 
$gsplit_dwarf -dumpbase a -dumpbase-ext a" {} {{a.???r.final a.su -0.s}}
+
+
 # Below are examples taken from the documentation.
 # They are likely redundant with earlier test,
 # but we want to make sure behavior matches the docs.



-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    he/him    https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Evangelist              Stallman was right, but he's left :(
GNU Toolchain Engineer           Live long and free, and prosper ethically

Reply via email to