On Thu, 2020-08-13 at 17:55 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 05:11:11PM -0500, will schmidt wrote: > > > > That is probably a level of detail that is not > > > > really needed in the GCC code comment. Probably best to just > > > > change > > > > the comment to read something like "ISA 3.0 sign extend > > > > builtins". > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > > As long as there are no issues defining the builtins for 3.0 here. > > AFAIK they are not documented in ISA 3.0. This is a happy accident > > that these ISA 3.1 builtins can be implemented with existing > > support. > > There are *no* builtins defined in the ISA! The insns are just ISA > 3.0 > instructions. >
Ok. So then maybe just "Sign extend builtins" and leave off the ISA reference all together. :-) thanks -WIll > > Segher
