On Aug 24, 2020, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> OK for trunk, thanks.
>> Given the approval and the lack of significant changes, I'll put this in >> unless there are objections in the next 48 hours. Thanks for the review! > Thanks. There's a new FAIL due to a bad merge. Erhm... Weird, I don't recall any manual adjustments to packaged_task/cons/alloc.cc. Indeed, the changes look exactly the same that Corentin had proposed before. Maybe the constraints were already there, but hte unintended effects were not noticeable before the change to the default? Anyway, thanks for fixing the failure. That said, I confess I don't get how this test will (or should) ever be run in C++14 mode, being given an explicit -std=gnu++11. Is this really the right way to go about it? -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
