I've just seen Richard's status email, so I guess this should wait for 4.8
On 9 January 2012 08:48, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > GCC's implementation of <stdbool.h> is not valid for C++11 because > [support.runtime] p8 says "The header <cstdbool> and the header > <stdbool.h> shall not define macros named bool, true, or false." > > This patch adds a libstdc++ test for that requirement and adjusts > stdbool.h to meet it. I've left _Bool defined in C++ as a GNU > extension. > > It's conceivable someone is relying on these macros being defined in > C++, in which case we could only define them when __cplusplus < > 201103L, but IMHO it's better to not define them at all. > > Tested x86_64-linux, OK for trunk? > > gcc/ > * ginclude/stdbool.h (true, false, bool): Do not define for C++. > > libstdc++/ > * testsuite/18_support/headers/cstdbool/macros.cc: New.
