On 29/05/20 07:17 +0100, Mike Crowe via Libstdc++ wrote:
This series ensures that the std::future::wait_* functions use
std::chrono::steady_clock when required, introduces
std::chrono::__detail::ceil to make that easier to do, and then makes
use of that function to simplify and improve the fix for PR68519 in
std::condition_variable.

v1 of this series was originally posted back in September 2017 (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2017-09/msg00083.html )

v2 of this series was originally posted back in January 2018 (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2018-01/msg00035.html )

v3 of this series was originally posted back in August 2018 (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2018-08/msg00001.html )

v4 of this series was originally posted back in October 2019 (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01934.html )

Changes since v4:

* Expose std::chrono::ceil as std::chrono::__detail::ceil so that it
 can be used to fix PR91486 in std::future::wait_for (as suggested by
 John Salmon in PR91486.)

* Use std::chrono::__detail::ceil to simplify fix for PR68519 in
 std::condition_variable::wait_for.

* Also fix equivalent of PR68519 in
 std::condition_variable::wait_until and add test.

I've pushed this series (except for patch 8/8) to trunk now, with only
minor indentation changes in the code and some ChangeLog reformatting.

Thanks for your persistence in getting this fixed, and sorry it took
so many years!

Reply via email to