On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > Attached is an updated revision of the patch. Besides the tweaks > above it also contains a cosmetic change to the warning issued > for mismatches in unspecified VLA bounds: it points at the decl > with more of them to guide the user to specify them rather than > make them all unspecified.
The previous version of the patch had a while loop as previously discussed to handle skipping multiple consecutive cdk_attrs. + next = pd->declarator; + while (next && next->kind == cdk_attrs) + next = next->declarator; This version is back to an "if", but I don't see anything else in the new version of that function that actually means the "if" would skip multiple consecutive cdk_attrs as desired. The patch is OK with the "while" restored there. If for some reason the "while" breaks something, we'll need to look in more detail at exactly what case isn't being handled correctly by "while". -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
