Denis Chertykov schrieb:

Committed

Denis

Some questions regarding the fix:

1) You know if PR42204 is still relevant and can be closed?
   Or is it not related to PR50925?

2) Can we remove from avr.c:avr_option_override() the following:

   if (avr_strict_X)
     flag_caller_saves = 0;

   that hacked around similar spill fails?

3) As PR50775 is fixed: Would it make sense to turn on
   -mstrict-X per default now, i.e. no more fake X
   addressing except requested per -mno-strict-X?

Johann

Reply via email to