Denis Chertykov schrieb:
CommittedDenis
Some questions regarding the fix: 1) You know if PR42204 is still relevant and can be closed? Or is it not related to PR50925? 2) Can we remove from avr.c:avr_option_override() the following: if (avr_strict_X) flag_caller_saves = 0; that hacked around similar spill fails? 3) As PR50775 is fixed: Would it make sense to turn on -mstrict-X per default now, i.e. no more fake X addressing except requested per -mno-strict-X? Johann