Here, in r11-155, I changed the call to uses_template_parms to
type_dependent_expression_p_push to avoid a crash in C++98 in
value_dependent_expression_p on a non-constant expression.  But that
prompted a host of complaints that we now warn for value-dependent
expressions in templates.  Those warnings are technically valid, but
people still don't want them because they're awkward to avoid.  So let's
partially revert my earlier fix and make sure that we don't ICE in
value_dependent_expression_p by checking potential_constant_expression
first.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/10?

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/96675
        PR c++/96742
        * pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build): Call uses_template_parms instead of
        type_dependent_expression_p_push.  Only call uses_template_parms
        for expressions that are potential_constant_expression.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/96675
        PR c++/96742
        * g++.dg/warn/Wdiv-by-zero-3.C: Turn dg-warning into dg-bogus.
        * g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare3.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/warn/Wtype-limits5.C: New test.
        * g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash10.C: Remove dg-warning.
---
 gcc/cp/pt.c                                        |  6 ++++--
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdiv-by-zero-3.C         |  6 ++++--
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare3.C | 11 +++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtype-limits5.C          | 11 +++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash10.C        |  1 -
 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare3.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtype-limits5.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index dc664ec3798..8aa0bc2c0d8 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -19618,8 +19618,10 @@ tsubst_copy_and_build (tree t,
       {
        /* If T was type-dependent, suppress warnings that depend on the range
           of the types involved.  */
-       bool was_dep = type_dependent_expression_p_push (t);
-
+       ++processing_template_decl;
+       const bool was_dep = (!potential_constant_expression (t)
+                             || uses_template_parms (t));
+       --processing_template_decl;
        tree op0 = RECUR (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0));
        tree op1 = RECUR (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1));
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdiv-by-zero-3.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdiv-by-zero-3.C
index 424eb0c3d49..01f691f2878 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdiv-by-zero-3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdiv-by-zero-3.C
@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ foo (T t, int i)
 {
   int m1 = 10 / t;
   int m2 = 10 / i;
-  int m3 = 10 / (sizeof(T) - sizeof(int)); // { dg-warning "division by" }
-  int m4 = 10 / N; // { dg-warning "division by" }
+  // People don't want to see warnings for type- or value-dependent
+  // expressions.
+  int m3 = 10 / (sizeof(T) - sizeof(int)); // { dg-bogus "division by" }
+  int m4 = 10 / N; // { dg-bogus "division by" }
   return m1 + m2 + m3 + m4;
 }
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare3.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare3.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..89bf1b619a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtautological-compare3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/96675
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wtautological-compare" }
+
+template<char c>
+constexpr bool f(char d) {
+    return 'a' <= c && c <= 'z' ? (d | 0x20) == c :
+        'A' <= c && c <= 'Z' ? (d & ~0x20) == c :
+        d == c;
+}
+static_assert(f<'p'>('P'), "");
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtype-limits5.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtype-limits5.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5e79123b622
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wtype-limits5.C
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/96742
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wtype-limits" }
+
+template <unsigned N>
+bool f(unsigned x) {
+    return unsigned(x < N);
+}
+
+int main() {
+    f<0>(1);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash10.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash10.C
index 012e3d0c11b..a84b19004ee 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash10.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash10.C
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ public:
   enum { val = (N == 0) ? M : GCD<N, M % N>::val };
 // { dg-error "constant expression" "valid" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
 // { dg-message "template argument" "valid" { target *-*-* } .-2 }
-// { dg-warning "division by" "" { target *-*-* } .-3 }
 };
 
 int main() {

base-commit: 1aeb7d7d67d167297ca2f4a97ef20f68e7546b4c
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to